I'm late leaving the office because of administrative issues. I get to the airport one hour before the flight is scheduled to leave. I grab a salad and eat it for lunch.
My stomach was already.... Uhhh.... Bubbly. So, no cheese.
I'm on the plane and lower the window shade after it takes off and I fall asleep. Two hours later, the plane is descending and I wake up.
*Snif*
OK.... Someone cut a good one.
*OH DAMN*
I cut a good one.
"Oh well, I'm the only one on the row."
The plane lands, and is at the terminal. I get up to get my bag out of overhead and this Asian woman cuts me a look. The man next to her also gives me a look.
OH. Well.
You should have moved.
I find this type of political games to be childish, illogical, and appealing to hard core partisans who are irrational, IMO, any way.
One, they both say they are friends.
Two, I've seen evidence to support what they both say.
Three, it would force them, even if not their supporters, to hit on all issues without the race baiting. If Blacks are evenly split, it's a win because Steele should then be looked at as a model. I think he should anyway because he actually talks TO people instead of AT them. If Steele wins the Black vote by a large margin, then he would definitely be a model. If Mfume wins, then you can look at Steele's performance and try to find out why he has done so bad.
P.S.
Payton Manning is a punk.
Barry Tested Positive for Cocaine Use In the Fall
Drug Check Ordered After Tax Case Plea
By Yolanda Woodlee and Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, January 11, 2006; A01
D.C. Council member Marion Barry tested positive for cocaine use in the fall in a drug test ordered by a court after he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor tax charges, according to two sources familiar with Barry's case.
Barry, who served four terms as mayor and was elected to the Ward 8 council seat in 2004, has since begun treatment for drug use, the sources said, but Barry's failure to pass the mandatory drug test puts him in legal jeopardy.
Because he violated the terms of his release, Barry, 69, faces an increased risk of serving the maximum 18 months behind bars -- rather than probation -- for his failure to file tax returns for six years. He is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 8, but a federal judge could jail him or sanction him at any time.
"Mind, body and soul" that!
That reminds me.
If anyone remembers Barry saying that at the press conference, they may have overlooked his surprised reaction when people really responded to that phrase. He KNEW then he had a winning theme and his "come back" started at that moment.
I go to bed last night and the news is reporting that one miner is dead with the fate of the others unknown.
I wake up and I hear that all miners except for one is dead. Then I hear a woman saying that orginally, they were all lived except for one and that they found out the truth hours later. This woman is now saying she's going to sue someone.
WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!
Your "loved one" has just been confirmed to have been killed in a mine accident and the first thing you think of is to sue someone?
Then I get home and my wife is livid because it's being reported that they were all in church praying when an "outsider" came in and said they were all alive except for one person. The people in the church start cheering. Then the pastor of the church asks people to pray for the family of the dead person, and very few people came up to pray for that family. The, later....
Right now I'm doing something dangerous, and that's writing when I don't have all of the facts. That's the blame being put on the media by the standard media critics, but I have to say if a rumor that the people are alive is going around, it's not a surprise that the media will report it, especially in this age of media competition. But they should have tried to fact check.
The media screwed up.
In the Baltimore area, a columnist for The Baltimore Sun resigned because "he had used sentences and paragraphs from other newspapers in some of his columns without attribution."
So another white newspaper person resigns because of suspect reporting/sourcing. What does this say about white newspaper writers?
I guess affirmative action is to blame.
I really don't like what I am about to do, but this is another moment, to me, where something must be said.
Again, off of this post, in the comment section:
But the question I really have for anyone is this:
Muslims in this country are recruiting blacks to come on board their religion of peace train faster than any other ethnic group. We have people like Mumia, Farrahkan, Muhhammed Ali, etc who have all climbed aboard the peace train in what they believe is a retaliation to whitey. Muslims play on black’s notion’s that whitey enslaved me and puts me down. What I find ironic is that Muslims were about 50% responsible for fueuling the TransAltantic Slave trade - Slaves breed in Western Africa were marched to the ports in the Sudan were they were traded for rum, tobacco and cotton. The Muslims were the ones who put Farrahkan’s ancestors on the boats that went to not only the US, but Cuba and South America. On top of that the Muslims were responsible for the death of over 128 African Slaves in their lands during the height of the Africa Slave Trade. The majority of these Africans who died were young girls and women sold as sex slaves throughout the middle east.
So why do blacks so hate America, but join the ranks of a Religion that did more damage (and is still doing damage today) to their ancestors and country than the US ever did.
Cowgirl
I'm sorry, but this is the sort of race baiting, making the Black Boogie Man garbage that I cannot let stand.
My response:
The supposition is wrong.
If Blacks hated America as you so assume, Blacks wouldn’t “disproportionately” join the armed services.
If Blacks hated America, those who did join the service and/or those who have clearances, would have a higer rate of espionage than can account for the general population of those who hold clearances.
The NOI Muslims make up 0.1%, that’s 1/10th of 1% of Black Americans. Black Americans, overwhelmingly, are Christian. The next largest group of Black Muslims are no more than 1% of the Black population.
So, you just created a boogy man of about 1.1% of the Black population.
So tell me why your comments should not be considered race baiting.
OK, now the reply?
Please get my comments straight - It has nothing to do with race baiting - it is factual.
Black Americans are the fast growing segment of the total population jumping on the Muslim bandwagon here in the US. Most of the recruiting is done in US Prison where Blacks make up a disportionately amount of the prison population. ...
Fact 1: After leaving jail, most of the people who joined Islam, don't maintain the adherence to it.
Fact 2: We are STILL talking about a Black Mulsim population of about 1-2% of the Black population.
Again, that's 1-2% of the Black population. Wow.
By the way, please don’t start on the poverty band wagon....
Given, I never mentioned poverty, and I am on record as saying poverty is not an excuse, why would that poster go there?
Farrakan, Ali, Mumia are Black Muslims who make racists statements about America and whitey keeping them down and enslaving them. Yet they belong to a Religion that has done more damage in the past and today to the African nations and Their African ancestors than another other nation, country or group of people that exists today or ever existed. These are all facts and have nothing to do with race baiting.
When a person writes "asks", So why do blacks so hate America, and then goes on to make 1-2% of the population as representative of the entire population, why is that NOT race baiting?
The below are comments I put on LaShawn Barber's blog in response to this post.
I just shake my head and wonder how I see positives and negatives while others seem to see just the negative or just want to focus on that, but not both.
In context, there was nothing wrong with what Morgan Freeman said. Those in my circle of the universe who heard the complete comment, in context, agreed with his comment. Most said that when Black history is accurately engrained in American history, then Black History Month, which is just designation, can “go away”. Wasn’t that the intention Dr. Carter G. Woodson creating Black History Week in the first place? Why does that bit of history get removed from the picture? Pun intended.
OK, now a specific comment:
Rarely, if ever, do you hear black people expressing disgust for out-of-control crime rates or lecturing other blacks about their responsibility to stay out of the criminal justice system.
Strange, I hear it on a not infrequent basis. My circle of travel includes poor to well off and I hear it across the boundaries.
But, hey, I’m considered “liberal” by some and thus can be discounted.
BTW, others consider me "conservative", so I think that says A LOT about the definitions.
Honestly, between the negativity coming out of public Black liberals and the comments coming out of public Black conservatives, it’s a wonder more Blacks don’t blow their brains out (drinking, drugging, or literally) in dispair.
Merry Christmas.
I'm really upset about the use of happy holidays instead of Merry Christmas.
This time of year is about Christmas which is celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ, our Savior.
If you are upset about people saying Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas, I trust:
If not...
*S*M*A*C*K*
That cyber pimp smack was for you to knock some damn sense into your head!!!!
Where are your priorities?
So what if store management tells its employees to say "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas"?
What is Christmas really about anyway?
Merry Christmas.
Well, there are some people out there who seem to be on a crusade to save Christmas in the public square of business. Some want businesses to continue wishing "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays".
Well, if you ask me, those who really care about Christmas should want to disassociate Christmas from the "holidays".
Read this post I did earlier and you should get my point.
I've written about the alleged name calling against Michael Steele.
I've written about my distaste for the name calling, but questioned the article because of what was directly quoted vs. what was paraphrased.
This is now national news and I'm wondering why:
Actually, I do know why and I have to ask why Michael Steele, someone who, from what I know, I think I like, politically, needs to be protected from normal Black politics?
I know you don't care, but this is what I have personally witnessed:
The following are samples of hate mail that Colbert I. King received:
Some folks are really touchy these days. Take, for instance, these four readers: D.G., J., W.T. and D.L. They didn't care for my column on Harriet Miers ["The Right, on Fire Over Miers," Oct. 8] and thus availed themselves of the opportunity to tell me so by e-mail.
Wrote D.G.: "Some portly Episcopalian [an indelicate reference to moi ] who condones the systemic elimination of the helpless Unborn styles himself a good heart because he happens to be black and benefiting from the Graham family's quota mania. What a joke!!!"
From J.: "If you weren't Black, you wouldn't get a job in journalism. You are in due to a tacit quota system."
And W.T.: "Reading your article is like watching a black minstrel doing his song and dance with words. Pure buffoonery! Affirmative action writer in action."
Finally, D.L.: "king...your article was biased and fulla[expletive] . . . so pack it up your liberal [expletive] sideways."
I seem to remember Michelle Malkin showing some hate email that set off a round of faux disgust from around the right leaning blogosphere.
So, Michelle Malkin gets hate mail. What's the big deal?
Really.
What makes her special?
Since I have time to waste, I decided to check the blogspot.com domain to see if anyone referenced the hate emails Colbert I. King received. I found one reference to the article but it was for the article itself.
I searched the typepad.com domain as well, and saw references to other articles, but not this one.
That's different from Michelle Malkin's situation, isn't it?
It seems, to me, that "minority" conservatives are being given special treatment by conservatives. Some would call that patronizing.
The Civil Rights Movement was about changing public policy to allow full access to the promise of America.
It was about allowing full access to all schools.
It was about allowing full access to the voting booth.
It was about allowing full access to jobs.
It was about allowing full access to opportunities.
It WASN'T about disallowing people to "act the fool". That is a home training and/or moral and/or gray matter issue. It's not a "Civil Rights" issue.
Stopping rappers from spewing filth isn't a "Civil Rights" issue, it is a moral and human rights issue.
Stopping the insane use of "nigger" by Black people is not a "Civil Rights" issue, it is a self-respect issue.
Stopping crime is a moral and community issue not a "Civil Rights" issue.
Lowering the high rate of out of wedlock births is a moral issue and a poverty issue and a social issue, not a "Civil Rights" issue.
At least that's how I see it.
The local media is asking the question and the response being shown is, "I didn't think it would be that bad".
Some thoughts:
The title says it all.
I remember when airlines served "decent" food, now you have to load up before the flight, in the airport.
I had to laugh when I saw a Black woman break out aluminum foil from a big bag and pass out home fried chicken.
I started to pay her for a piece of the bird.
I still don't understand why speculating can drive up gas prices so fast, but reality causes downward adjustments to happen slowly.
You tell me that makes sense.
The government fails, time and time again, and it is due to its massive size, politics, hubris, incompetance, and graft.
While I wasn't blogging when the Department of Homeland Security was created, I stated in web forums and email lists that creating that department was nothing but a waste of time and money.
If its main job was to prevent another 9/11, all that had to be done was to add a cabinet position to head over seeing of the different 3 letter agencies to make sure that they share information in a timely and efficient manner. Then all that had to be done was to give that position the authority to fire people at will and remove regulations that prevented information from being shared. That position should also have had an inside track to be able to go to congress and state what laws needed to be changed or removed to bring down the legal barriers between the different 3 letter agencies.
Note: Some of those laws are the reason for "The Wall" and those laws are on the books because of prior abuses by the different 3 letter agencies. I know this, but some of the resulting regulations were a burden.
As anyone should be able to see right now, putting FEMA under Homeland Defense was a stupid move. And putting Brown in charge of FEMA was also a stupid move. Yes, it was everyday politics, but the man is in over his head.
Before the hurricane, the mayor of New Orleans said that because of the size of the hurricane, the people of NOLA would be essentially on their own. After the hurricane hit, he was on the air, rightly, blasting lack of a response from the federal government.
Well, he should have included local government and state government in that, but he didn't.
Note: I'm on the road again and I just don't feel like web surfing to find the links to back what I'm writing. Yeah, I'm lazy, cranky, my head hurts, and I ate some bad airport food that is tearing my stomach up. So go look for it for yourself.
The local and state authorities told those who couldn't get out to go to the Super Dome. They did. Then they were subject to searches before being allowed to enter the Dome. The local authorites in the Dome, apparently, couldn't do anything about the criminals who entered the Dome and took advantage of the situation. They should have let people keep knives and such.
Note: I've started to question what is being reported about the crime. Not because of race issues, but because of things like this. Yeah, I linked it. It's in another tab right now, that's why.
Trying to get back on track....
The local and state government failed those who couldn't get out. They failed the hospitals. When the local police were in search and rescue mode, they let the looters rules, so they failed to protect those who needed protecting.
The authorities are sending children without parents or guardians to locations outside of LA. Now you have parentless children, possibly STATES away from their family. Children are being harmed while being saved. This is like foster care. When it goes right, it goes right. When it goes wrong, the foster care system destroys families and harms kids. (Don't. Even. Get. Me. Going. About. The. Foster. Care. System).
There is a radio interview being played on talk radio concerning a woman who is relaying her experience with FEMA. FEMA asked her for an address. She has none. They asked her for her telephone number. She has none. She was calling from a temporary space set up by Allstate. The location? A field. They asked for a fax number. She had none.
Oh, and let us not forget about the NOLA evacuation plan that called for buses to be used to transport people out of The Big Easy. Instead, they are flooded.
That's the government in action.
The government is best at confiscating money from tax payers. But otherwise, people should consider to be on your own and operate from that premise.
If you didn't know before, now you know.
And to anyone who is surprised by what I'm writing, it's because you never asked, otherwise I would have told you something like this before.
Black Americans have to be the most internally questioning people in the U.S.
The idea that Blacks "speak behind closed doors" is a farce. Things are mentioned on Black talk radio. Things are mentioned in Black print media. The idea about Blacks "speaking behind closed doors" rests on the idea that it's "behind closed doors" because media appointed "Black leaders" aren't QUOTED as saying certain things. Then, critics of the American Black community, white and Black, say that because those "leaders" aren't saying things, it isn't being said.
False.
Then those same critics will say that those "Black leaders" don't speak for all Blacks.
True.
Then those same critics will say that the Black community, in general, is being "lead" by the "Black leaders".
Then those same critics will point out where the "Black leaders" are not sychronized with the general Black community.
Ummm.... Ain't there some contradictions there somewhere?
If you love your brother, you are going to share that bag of ice with your brother.
A person I know was living in a multi-family dwelling. One of her neighbors was a crack head. This crack head started a fire because she fell asleep while cooking her next dose of crack.
The house burned down.
The "11 O'Clock News" arrived and went on air live. The camera approached the woman I know. The next thing you see is her mouthing, "If you don't get that camera out of my face, I'm going to shove that camera up your ___".
Some thoughts coming out of this mess:
I haven't written anything about Cindy Sheehan, because, frankly, I don't see the point in it.
The woman was anti-war before her son was killed. After her son was killed, she was still anti-war, and is doing what she thinks needs to be done so that no other mothers face what she is facing.
Other mothers take a view opposite of Cindy Sheehan. That's their view.
To date, I think many on the anti-Sheehan side have been pathetic and over the top in their opposition to her. Frankly, it's made me sick to my stomach. However, on the Fox News Sunday, I saw some sanity.
Chris Wallace had two mothers who each had a son killed in the war. One wanted the troops to come home IFF the reason for being there could not be explained well enough, while the other supported the mission as is.
Wallace and the segment producer did an outstanding job presenting rational women who presented rational views. And at the end, Wallace did something that too many pundits and news articles are not doing: he asked about their commonality.
I bit the title of this entry from P6 because the phrase fits.
The more "conversations" I have online, the more hardened my idea becomes that Blacks shouldn't be involved in the "left" vs. "right" garbage.
From the online conversations, and a few "real world" conversations, I get more data points to support my thesis that most people don't understand what "conservative" means or what "liberal" means.
For example, I've been called conservative because:
But at the same time...
I've been called a liberal because:
Let's just state the obvious. The sad state of politics in the U.S. has lead to an even sadder state of politics within the Black community.
For liberals, if you support Republicans or too harshly criticize "Black leaders" -- although most Black criticize "Black leaders" -- or don't buy into the insane mau-mauing by the "Blacker than thou" cabal, then you are a conservative.
For conservatives, if you don't continuously attack "Black leaders", or you don't support Republicans, or you don't like Clarence Thomas, then you are a liberal.
It's insane.
What happened to the "right" to "think for yourself"?
But what do I know? This is just mental masturbation.
On the most segregated day in the country, a thought just occurred to me.
Some accuse "Hollywood liberals" of being racist because Blacks and other "people of color" have a very hard time getting roles. But Hollywood is a very capitalist system, meaning those who generate money, get money to generate more money.
If "Hollywood liberals" give Blacks and other "people of color" fewer roles, maybe it's because they think that Blacks and "people of color" won't generate the type of revenue that they are seeking. And if that's the case, is it Hollywood, or the audience, who is to blame?
Think about it. How can the collective group with one of the lowest average net worth be such consumers instead of savers?
One day, Gregory Kane was the guest of a conservative radio talk show host. Kane was going on about some "problem" in the Black community. Actually, the "problem" was that "Black leaders" weren't saying something about a situation that Kane believed they should be saying something about.
I called in and launched on him and the host. I asked why it is that "Black leaders" are blasted for thing they are "not doing" when Blacks who are doing things are not pointed out. Specifically, I pointed out Black Professional Men, Inc., and asked why they are not given more press when they are doing things that "Black leaders" are not doing.
The host jumped in and said, essentially, because negative news sells. No one wants to talk about positive news.
That's the mindset that is part of the scrambled brain syndrome that Blacks suffer from that I wrote about above.
The next election cycle, the Republicans gained control of the House. For most people, term limits stopped being an issue.
Does anyone else notice that the same people who were backing term limits of congress criters are now backing term limits for the Supreme Court?
Attractive women -- women who are physically beautiful, have bodies that are "ideal", or have personalities that shine -- know that they are desireable. They know that they are wanted. They know that they have a larger pool to pick from. As such, they act accordingly.
Meanwhile, the men that go after them do some stupid and/or degrading, to themselves, things.
Until...
The women meet that man that they find attractive -- physically, financially, or socially -- then they lose control of the relationship. They tend to want that man so much that they "over look" things like behavior, attitude, the other women, etc.
Then the men gain control. If the men want to take advantage of the situation, they will. Then the woman gets hurt and blames men.
But in all of the bad relationships she has been in, she's the constant factor. So why doesn't she blame herself and get herself together?
You never heard of the Perry family? Well, you're right. But I can tell you stories of my clan that are nothing short of inspiring and life affirming.
I stand on their shoulders. I will not let them down.
Are you "tired" of my comments in blogs where you assume I never tell what I think or advocate?
Here's your chance to ask me a question. The ground rules are this:
The worst thing about being ordinary is that since you are surrounded by same, there is nothing to remind you of your condition.
If the only place you know is the area of neurons where your consciousness was born, then no matter how much you glance around, everything seems fine and in order;
The ordinary human is born, wired & programmed in the nervous-system to be a seventy-year continuity; to live & die ordinary; to think only ordinary thoughts, and feel only ordinary emotions;
What are you if you choose to leave ordinariness – leave your natural-born-mind? Employing nothing but your own awareness, how might you accomplish a permanent escape from the ordinary?
While running errands with the wife and kid, all around me I saw young children, young adults, and adults, all reading a green book.
Amazing...
The following are the sources of the current destruction of the U.S.
Cobb wrote this about his view of the Black Political Spectrum.
I put the following in the comment section.
Thinks a bit...
I think my relation to society is that I am part of a society that has set high goals for itself, but has only historically recently, really started to live the goals that it has set for itself.
There are definitely problems that still abound, but some of those will always be around: crime, poverty, deviency. Society sets the standards and society addresses those that live outside of the standards.
"As Black folk", we are a part of the society as a whole, even though there are many who view us outside of society and still not willing to be a part of society. For "Black folk" in general, that view is garbage. And, IMNSHO, speaks to the ignorance and bias of those who think so, regardless of race.
Thinks...
But racism or other's ignorance ain't our greatest foe, though it is one that can beat down those who aren't prepared. Our own ignorance is greater. But I'm hard pressed to think of something that IS our GREATEST foe.
After writing that, I'll add some more thoughts.
There are those who will say that morality is our greatest issue. I understand that point as well and have some sympathy for it, but if you go strictly by the Bible, most of America is immoral. If you don't believe me, look up the statistics on out of wedlock sexual activity of those under 21 and ask yourself if it moral to have sex outside of marriage.
Education definitely is a problem as well as business creation. The latter is improving, the former has some bright spots and some bleak spots.
Now for the big "DUH" moment: it's not one thing is the combination of all things that provide the biggest challenge.
But African-Americans are Americans, and most Blacks know and understand this. I say to you, question all of those who say otherwise. Question all of those who say Blacks are not part of the mainstream. No matter what they tell you to support their idea, the are shoveling muck.
On Cobbs analysis, it breaks down in my view because it doesn't take into account the role of government. Despite what the critics state, the view of Blacks toward the government is more complex than "depending on the government for everything." Welfare doesn't define Black America, neither does "depending on the government."
Liberal, conservative, progressive, whatever. Trash those labels. Blacks can't afford to be a part of that nonsense.
The Good Reverend Pays A Visit
Rev. Jackson's message is to stay in school, stay off drugs, and get involved in civil service. Rev. Jackson was introduced by Key Club president, Kendra Chapman-Small. As he spoke to the student body, he emphasized society's continual confusion about teenagers' role in the community. "...we can't quite find a place for you," said Rev. Jackson.
In addition, he asked the student body as whole several questions about drug use, suicide, and firearms. Rev. Jackson lead students who wished to pray in prayer.
Choices and consequences were illuminated in Rev. Jackson's motivational speech, attempting to deter students from habits with harmful consequences.
"Life is full of choices and consequences," said Rev. Jackson.
Jesse Jackson likes to say that we don’t lower the basketball hoop to nine-and-a-half feet for our students and we shouldn’t lower the academic hoop either.
Sharpton recalled running into a couple of young gangsta rappers at a Los Angeles nightspot a few months ago. He said they approached him and commended him for his work.
The young rappers then went on to say they were making a statement, too.
"We just full of rage," Sharpton quoted them as saying. "We're angry."
The young rappers railed against societal injustice against black men and how their music was their response.
Sharpton said he stopped them and asked whether they got paid for their rapping.
Of course, they said, telling how twice a year they go to the office of their record labels to pick up their royalty checks.
"When you go twice a year to your record company and you go up to the vice president of accounting's office and you see his secretary to get your royalty check, do you call her a bitch?"
When the gansta rappers said they didn't, Sharpton said he responded, "Then you're not as angry as you thought you were."
Sharpton said he told the rappers, "You should not get paid to disrespect yourself and your mother and your wife and your girlfriend and your sister and your daughter."
OK, so if people constantly criticize the actions of the U.S. in Iraq, and never show the positive side of what is going on, then they are said to hate America.
Soooooo....
If people constantly criticize Blacks in the U.S., and never show the positive things that are going on, can they be said to hate Blacks?
· Patients with schizophrenia, a disease characterized by hallucinations and disorganized thinking, recover sooner and function better in poor countries with strong extended family ties than in the United States, two long-running studies by the World Health Organization have shown.Full Monty· People of Mexican descent born in the United States have twice the risk of disorders such as depression and anxiety, and four times the risk of drug abuse, compared with recent immigrants from Mexico. This finding is part of a growing body of literature that indicates that the newly arrived are more resilient to mental disorders, and that assimilation is associated with higher rates of psychiatric diagnoses.
· Black and Hispanic patients are more than three times as likely to be diagnosed with schizophrenia as white patients -- even though studies indicate that the rate of the disorder is the same in all groups.
· White women in the United States are three times as likely to commit suicide as black and Hispanic women -- a difference that experts attribute in part to the relative strengths of different social networks.
Reparations for Jim Crow makes much more sense than does reparations for slavery.
The same holds true for Tusla riot victims and Rosewood victims.
My mother is still alive. Her social security "income" is based on her salary, which was retarded most of her working life because of Jim Crow, segregation and legal discrimination. In turn, money is coming out of my pocket because it is my honor to help my mother out.
That's generational affects of discrimination and Jim Crow.
OK, after a meeting I decided I need a mental health break, so I went out for lunch. Since I was in a mall, I decided to check out Batman Begins. This is the best in the series, both in the actor to play Batman, and in the story. I give this a rating of 9 out of 10.
On the way home, I turned into a talk show and the hour's guest was Gregory Kane.
The host and Kane were deriding something called "Ethnic Math". Now, I have no idea what it is, what is behind it, or if it works or not. But what I do know is that it set me off.
I called in, got through the call screener and was placed in the top of the queue.
I asked Kane why is it that he doesn't spend more time show casing that Blacks aren't total screw ups. Why is it that "Black conservatives", who claim that "Black liberals" only show that Blacks are pathetic people looking for a government hand out, don't show things like The Algebra Project, or Black Professional Men, or 100 Black Men, etc.
I asked Kane, directly, why he doesn't write MORE about them? He replied that he has written about Ted Coates, to which I responded that I asked why he didn't write MORE about such groups.
He was someone lost for words at that point. And I admit at being a bit animated in my speaking. The host thanked me and disconnected me.
When they returned, Kane wasn't saying anything but the host was saying, essentially, that bad news always gets reported and its bad news that makes for good talk show topics.
Make of it what you will. Too bad I'm not a gamer. I'd put on GTA or some such thing and go off.
So a comment on Cobb has me somewhat torqued. And the comment can't get past a filter, so I'm putting it here and trackin' back.
I think he did answer your question, DarkStar; he simply declines to be constrained to answer it in a manner demanded by you. Because the question includes a presumption he doesn't accept, right?
Wrong, but thanks for playing.
Look at all that I wrote:
Why is that that "Black conservatives" and conservatives in general, in denouncing "Black leadership", never promote the people and organizations like those listed here, as being "Black leaders" or being representative of the Black community or the strengths of the Black community?
Note the bolded part?
I'm not pulling this question out of thin air. It's based on LONG TIME observations as well as taking part in a past "Black conservative email list" where they, THEMSELVES, were asking each other the same thing.
Look, I saw a dang near civil war over the 1st Trent Lott and CofCC association mess on that email list. What blew me away was a list of self proclaimed Black Republicans saying the same things about themselves that Black Democrats say about Black Republicans. When "sellout" was flying between them and when the phrase "Black CON-servative" was used, from a Gingrich staffer no less, I took notice.
So back up. I'm not constraining anyone. And I don't ever expect a straight forward answer from Cobb, based on experience. And that's not a bad thing, that just is what Cobb is.
I don't accept that Blacks are not mainstream. I've traveled outside of the country enough to know that line is garbage.
A separate nation is foolish. A separate agenda is NOT foolish but will never happen because the Black community is not monolithic; radicals, conservatives, liberals, apathetic, all have a place in the mix.
I recognize and say that the civil rights battle has been fought and won and the next needs are economic and moral. You pick the order of importance.
Straight up, the questions about Black politics are annoying on all sides. I'm not being wishy washy or a "stick my finger in the air and see which way the wind blows" or whatever slander some conservatives place on those who proclaim the "moderate" label. BTW, I proclaim no label.
Straight up, it's all b.s. and I call 'em all on it. "Both sides" are equally pessimistic, negative, and degrading of the Black community. Neither show the positives going on. And as a parent who has one on the cusp of standing on her own damn 2 feet, and another just on the breast, I don't have the patience for the garbage being spewed.
When a proclaimed liberal calls a man like Clinton a brotha and gets cheers, and Fox News proclaims a semi-literate, race pimp reverend named Jesse Lee Peterson a "Black leader" while at the same time denouncing the label "Black leader" and the need for such, some Blacks need to stand up and call people on their b.s.
Yeah, I called Jesse Jackson a punk some years ago. And I just called Jesse Peterson a race pimp. What other man of God would say that if a person wants to get saved, they should not go to a Black church? No, he didn't say a particular type of Black church, but any Black church.
Yeah...
I'm pissed.
I'm sleep deprived 'cuz the new baby has "cholic", plus the ish is hitting the fan on the "9-5".
It took WHITE CONSERVATIVES to point to good goings on in urban schools across the country. Something REEKS about that.
Breathe....
Presumptions my fanny...
I'm doing Google web searches for a web site that I'm doing and I put in the search string black mentor program.
While scanning the result list, I noticed the number of colleges that had mentorship programs. Now, I realize I'm a bit short of temper due to lack of sleep, but I got a bit salty.
You see, I realized that I have NEVER read any of the well know Black conservative commentators, who have spoken out against "Black Student Unions" and "separatism in colleges", mention that the Black Student Unions provide mentor programs or study programs for students at the colleges or for students in surrounding areas. Then I remembered that offspring #1 mentioned that she learned of a mentor program of "inner city students" her first year attending a university, and she will help out the rest of her time at the school.
Again, it seems that "Black conservatives" voice opinions that are overwhelmingly negative about the Black community. Then this "revelation" hit me:
Why is it that it took white conservatives to write a book that demonstrates success of Blacks in public schools?
Come July 1, I'll no longer be associated with Washington University in Saint Louis. Instead I'll be making the move to Johns Hopkins, the first modern research university. The decision to make the move was a lot harder than I thought it would be, so I'm taking the time to publicly thank the students and administration of Washington University in Saint Louis. I know some of them read the posts here. One of the things a school like Wash. U. promises students is personal relationships with their professors. At a school like Michigan, we never got those promises...and I wasn't mad. I WANTED a 35,000 Big Ten, Division I, Rose Bowl type groove. I expected to tolerate Wash. U. at best, with its 38,000/year tuition.
But going back for graduation it was clear to me how much I left there. I'll be back more than a few times. It's pretty cheap to get there, and the summers are cool (figuratively not literally). Damn it was a good run though.
For those of you reading, send this around. You know where to find me. If you need anything, LET ME KNOW.
1. The U.S. is a Constitutional Representative Republic.
2. The Senate exists to protect the "wishes of the small states" against the "wishes of the big states". Thus Delaware's senators have the same weight as California's.
The fillibuster is fine. "Secret holds" that prevent the committee from even voting is "undemocratic".
Let's get down to the basics, senate and house committees are undemocratic. Why should, say, 12 representatives or senators get to decide the bills that make it to the floor or appointees that get a vote? Why should the chairman of a committee, ONE PERSON even get to decide whether or not a bill or appointee gets a chance to face a vote in the committee?
I keep saying that Sharpton is doing more to break the binds of Blacks to Democrats than Black Republicans are doing to break the binds of Blacks to Democrats; and he is.
And who are those Confederate flag supporters today?
Your mother and father are together.
They are having problems, but everyone has problems. You love them both.
The neighborhood finds out that your father is cheating with an old girlfriend. Your mother is embarrassed, you are embarrassed, and everyone knows your family business. Meanwhile, your mother is getting some on the side but is doing a better job keeping hush hush about it.
Later on, your mother is killed in a tragic accident. Then to your dismay, all of her business becomes neighborhood gossip as well as your father's business.
Some time later, your father decides to marry the woman who he was cheating with on your mother. The same woman who used to be an old girlfriend. And your father asks you to take a part in the wedding.
If that ain't Jerry Springer, what is?!?!?!
Poor trash meet royal trash.
The answer is: “The facts don’t exactly match the acts.”
So what is the question? -- that’s right:
“How would you best describe an ordinary man’s intellectual life?”
Some random thoughts that have arisen because of this sad affair:
Suppose what happened with Tupac happened today. Suppose people found out that the mother decided to tell the doctors "DNR". Would his life be worth saving?
Many of us will have to deal with this situation, if we haven't done so already.
When I worked in the U.K., a woman needed to have the test done for Tay-Sachs disease. She had it done, but the test results got lost in the medical system. She and her husband had a window of opportunity to get the test done and they feared the second test results would not be returned in time.
You see, on a regular basis, children in the womb who test positive for the disease are aborted.
And the outcry there is where?
Oh. My. How did I miss THAT okie doke? I've been doped on a rope. I didn't connect the dots.
What am I talking about? Eminent domain in New London.
I read somewhere on the web where eminent domain was used by a local government to condemn a Toyota dealership so that someone could open a BMW dealership.
I know why congress hasn't addressed it loudly. It's because the buggers benefit. The government doing a land grab and not paying fair value is something the critters like. The fact that they can do it for people who will fill their coffers, is even better.
The bastards.
[ Edited for some clean up ]
If "Black liberals" can be race hustlers, why can't "Black conservatives"?
[ edited ] Didn't Alan Keyes race hustle when he ran for the senate seat in Illinois? Come on, tell the truth.
From an exchange on Booker Rising:
Massie as race hustler, DS? Which race is he hustling?
LB, I number of times I've pointed out glaring inconsistencies in some of his pieces.
In this one, I point out that he's slamming Blacks for the idea of a Black community. If he believes that Blacks should look at Blacks as a part of America, then he should stop bashing the Black community because it's something that he doesn't believe in.
By bashing the Black community, which he doesn't believe in, he's using race when it's convienient. Thus, to me, he's hustling the race issue.
Next, the idea that most Blacks don't consider ourselves as being part of America fails under the light of inspection.
Start with the fact that Blacks are more likely to live in an integrated neighborhood than whites. Continue with the fact that most Blacks still strive for, and believe in, integration.
Consider the make up of the military, recent recruiting data not withstanding. The percentage of Blacks in the military exceeds the percentage of Blacks in the general population. If Blacks didn't consider ourselves as a part of America, the percentage in the service would be lower than in the general