October 01, 2005

Bennett, Cosby, and Barnes Pt. 2 WHAT MAKES A SLAVE

In writing about Cosby and black people, Steven Barnes has this to say about black life:

I take the position that massive damage was done to black America by slavery (by the way--slavery also gave the descendants of those slaves some kick-ass opportunities, so I'm not looking for guilt here). If that damage was done, you will find the evidence of it in either "software" or "hardware". I'm betting "software." How do you get an elephant to remain tied to a rail he can pluck up with a shake of his head? You start when he is a baby elephant, and the conditioning will last. How do you create a slave? You impose helplessness upon them, make them dependant, in essence change a wolf into a dog, begging for scraps at the master's table.

Ever been to the circus? If you have you'll note that they don't really use much in the way of security to prevent an elephant from fleeing. Just one little rope tied around the ankle. No extra security guards. No electrified fences. Nothing.

Contrast this with the way that enslaved Africans were treated in the south.

An entire series of laws were designed to keep them from congregating, traveling, and learning. Enslaved Africans couldn't worship without the presence of whites. They were forbidden from reading. They were forbidden from traveling without a pass. They were forbidden from having funeral services. They were forbidden from using weapons. They were forbidden from using drums.

Then on top of that there were a series of very invasive laws designed to actually track down runaways. All types of white southerners were able to make a good living off of becoming bounty hunters.

And then on top of THAT there was the actual maintenance of plantations. A complex series of overseers were required to regulate African life...and punish them for violating various codes.

Now let's go back to that elephant comparison.

If indeed black people were slaves, in the way that Barnes thinks...why exactly did whites need to spend all these resources keeping "slaves" in check? Why couldn't they just go with the single thin rope, like the one the elephants have?

Enslaved Africans fought tooth and nail from the moment they were put inside the slave castles, to the last day of the Civil War.

(quick question--would "slaves" have fled the south to fight against their masters in such large numbers?)

Helplessness? Read Foner's work on Reconstruction when you get the chance. There is a passage there in which Foner talks about a young white southerner. She was asked about life after slavery. Because enslaved Africans cooked for her, cleaned for her, and combed her hair, she was distraught. She now had no one to do those things for her...and she did not know how to do them herself!. Being enslaved in the American context meant that Africans were chattel. They were brutalized, beaten, raped, neutered, and had their lives brutally mangled. But as I write next, enslaved Africans and their descendants are largely responsible for whatever weak level of democracy we've ascended to, and the most powerful aspects of American culture come from black bodies as well.

Someone's hardware and software has been badly damaged. But to the degree that we are comparing here, I say that that someone doesn't look or sound like me. I'd take a look at the girl who doesn't know how to comb her own hair.

Posted by at October 1, 2005 10:51 AM | TrackBack

Since I first became aware of it, the hidden history of the second amendment has been a cornerstone of my understanding of the true intentions of Madison and his cronies. It's one of the primary reasons I can never get my head around apologetics for the republic and its rotten, stank, nasty-to-the-core architecture. This has always been a culture of projective fear.

Posted by: cnulan at October 1, 2005 05:23 PM

I think one of these days I'll read Foner. My cousin did several years ago and he found himself astounded at how remarkably un-docile those Africans were in comparison to what he had been led to believe. I am likely to conclude, despite what I have said about successive generations of blacks missing their opportunity to flee the South, that the 'legacy of slavery' is a bit overwrought.

Relatively speaking, it didn't take me a great deal of time or effort to discover my family tree going back to the days of Reconstruction. Unfortunately it's harder to get oldfolks to say boo when it comes to family history in the same way as we graduate student types are willing to accept History. In either case I have been a strong proponent of looking closely at black family histories as opposed to grabbing onto Afro(ec)centricities.

Posted by: Cobb at October 1, 2005 06:06 PM

"If you give us a fair chance..." - Majesty of the Blues.

By Foner's work on Reconstruction are you referring to "Nothing But Freedom" or some other work. I think it's one of the best small books I've ever read. He captures tons of information and also incorporates a thoughtful comparative international perspective to illuminate events in Africa, South America and the Caribbean.

You're right on LKS. The overwhelming majority of black folk know very little about slavery...after all, where would they have learned it. You can rightly disregard these comments as the uninformed reflections of a sci-fi guy writing beyond his area of expertise or comfort.

Posted by: Temple3 at October 1, 2005 06:23 PM

I'd like more amplification on the damage done to White people. What is the contemporary manifestation of "the girl who can't comb her own hair"?

Posted by: LDunnings at October 11, 2005 06:19 PM