February 12, 2005

Measuring Representation

A couple of comments on the side have left me realizing that I should probably talk a bit about race and representation. Do black people need to be represented by black candidates? I won't deal with the other question (if black people feel the need to be represented by black candidates are they prevented from having that need met?). It is germane as it represents the degree to which whites are unwilling to vote for black candidates, but I'm not going to deal with that right now.

The central theoretical work in this area is Hannah Pitkin's REPRESENTATION. Pitkin deals the various ways we might think about representation. Most focus on the distinction between symbolic and substantive representation, as blacks could be more effective at one than the other...or black citizens could want one more than they want the other.

Starting with Carol Swain's BLACK FACES BLACK INTERESTS, a number of scholars have tackled this question empirically. Rather than going through their works I'm going to talk a bit about measurement.

So what exactly do legislators do? They draft legislation, vote on legislation, sit on committees, alter amendments, visit with constituents, deal with constituent issues, vote in committees, give speeches on various issues, meet with President, negotiate with their parties...and some other stuff on top of that. And black mayors actually propose and implement budgets, hire officials, create rules regarding contracts, often negotiate contracts, etc.

There is a comparative question implicit in the black representation issue right? The real question is do black representatives represent black people better than non-black ones? Again, I'm not dealing with citizen preferences here, but not because they aren't important.

So the way to do this is simple. We've got rollcall records, voting records, committee meeting records, legislation records, we have some idea of how much time constituents spend at home, we've got records of their speeches, we know how much money they raise, and we know how they spend it. Most of these things would be coded and used as dependent variables. Then we'd need to know the race of the legislator, his party (it could be party rather than race doing the heavy lifting), the region (southern legislators are usually different), perhaps the type of district (urban vs. rural), and probably percentage black.

There are still areas that can be mined here. But what the literature says is pretty clear. Black legislators spend more time on issues that black citizens care about, their voting record is better, their behavior in committees is better, and i believe they spend more time on legislation than their non-black counterparts. Off the top of my head I cannot recall whether black representatives get more of their legislation actually PASSED. But this should be a start.

Posted by at February 12, 2005 10:31 AM | TrackBack

Measurement???

Shades of the curse of Ham. The precise moment these measurements are taken and that data is analyzed, it will reveal a degree of political nakedness very hard to reconcile with popular misconceptions about alleged radical, parochial, or other absurd mischaracterizations of black representative and political orientation.

Posted by: cnulan at February 12, 2005 12:39 PM

and surprise of surprise...this is exactly what the data shows. along with showing blacks do a better job than whites of representing black interests....

Posted by: Lester Spence at February 12, 2005 01:26 PM

Does this mean they are effective at getting legislation passed? And does it mean the passed legislation gets the results they wanted?

Posted by: DarkStar at February 13, 2005 12:18 AM

So explain to me that this question is more complex than simply observing that white politicians are to the political right of most blacks.

Posted by: dwshelf at February 13, 2005 01:44 AM

ed, the answer to your second question is no. i don't know whether the passed legislation does what they wanted it to do. no one has sought to answer (or even ask) this question. the first question is a good one. a couple of pieces make the argument that if having more black representatives means gerrymandering, then it is better to have more white representatives...for reasons of effectiveness.

dwshelf, it is more complicated. remember we are talking about legislators who are elected by constituents. to a certain extent the ideology of the legislator shouldn't matter in as much as he/she is trying to serve the will of his/her constituents.

Posted by: Lester Spence at February 16, 2005 11:01 AM